The eve of this historic election is a good time to think about the nature of leadership. When I think about the topic I often think of the many times I have been in church or seminary or read in a book about the “Biblical” model of leadership being one of “servant leadership”. Generally, this concept of servant leadership is described as being a life that is lead as an illustration of Jesus’s maxim that the “last shall be first and the first shall be last” or that “whoever would keep their life must loose it,” etc…
While it is clear to me that in each and every way living our lives by these teachings is to be commended and embraced, I am not sure that these maxims have anything to do with “leadership” per se. Let me explain.
There is a difference between following Jesus’s example and leading others. There is also a difference between picking lint from one’s bellybutton and leading others, or picking one’s nose and leading others. I hope you see my point. There is a categorical difference here that is conflated in popular Christian thought illegitimately. Its that old apples and oranges thing.
Let me say it a different way. Leading by transparent example is a legitimate skill to be mastered in the effort to lead and transfer that skill to others. The point of the leadership skill, however, is the successful embodiment of an appropriate example AND the transfer of that ability to others–not the content of that example. So, to bring the example full circle, we could speak of “lint-picking leadership” and “nose-picking leadership” if those skills were important to the practice of leading Christians. But that would be silly, since it is about the same as talking about the best golfers by describing their “putting-leadership”, “swing-form leadership”,”club-selection leadership” EVEN if they have no ability to transfer these skills to others.
No, executing a skill is not the same as leadership. One can un-hypocritically embody the content of the knowledge and practices one wishes to tranfer to others, but one must also effectively transmit these abilities to others to lead. That actually says something more profound about the nature of Christian leadership than describing it as ’servant leadership.’
It strikes me that there are many other principles of leadership that can be distilled besides the ability to transfer knowledge and skills (which might more accurately describe the nature of a teacher). One other such principle might be the ability to get others to act in situations in which, left to themselves, they might otherwise do nothing–the so called ‘catalyst’ principle, etc… The interesting thing about all such principles is that (it seems to me) they must be universally applicable to all situations and endeavors..not just Christian ones.
——————————————————
This post is part of a Synchroblog on Leadership. The following blogs took part in the experiment:
Jonathan Brink – Letter To The President
Adam Gonnerman – Aspiring to the Episcopate
Sally Coleman – In the world but not of it- servant leadership for the 21st Century Church
Alan Knox – Submission is given not taken
Joe Miller – Elders Lead a Healthy Family: The Future
Cobus van Wyngaard – Empowering leadership
Steve Hayes – Servant leadership
Geoff Matheson – Leadership
John Smulo – Australian Leadership Lessons
Helen Mildenhall – Leadership
Tyler Savage – Moral Leadership – Is it what we need?
Bryan Riley – Leading is to Listen and Obey
Susan Barnes – Give someone else a turn!
Liz Dyer – A Funny Thing Happened On The Way To The Polls…
Lionel Woods – Why Diverse Leadership is Good for America
Julie Clawson – Leadership Expectations
Ellen Haroutunian – A New Kind Of Leadership
Matt Stone – Converting Leadership
Steve Bradley – Lording or Leading?
Adam Myers – Two types of Leadership
Bethany Stedman – A Leadership Mosaic
Kathy Escobar – I’m Pretty Sure This Book Won’t Make It On The Bestseller List
Fuzzy Orthodoxy – Self Leadership
Sonja Andrews – Leadership In An Age of Cholera
Tara Hull – Leadership & Being A Single Mom
Glen Hager – Election Day Ponderings On Leadership
Tags: Leadership, Servant Leadership

Wednesday, November 5, 2008 at +00:0020083630UTC05: am30
I’m not sure I follow you. I think you may be trying to emphasize that leadership stands alone as a principle, but I am not sure how you have defined leadership or why you are making this distinction? Is it a reaction to something (the concept of servant leadership) more than a positive statement about leadership?
Wednesday, November 5, 2008 at +00:0020080630UTC05: pm30
[...] Kai – Leadership – Is Servant Leadership a Broken Model? [...]
Wednesday, November 5, 2008 at +00:0020082830UTC05: pm30
[...] Kai – Leadership – Is Servant Leadership a Broken Model? [...]
Thursday, November 6, 2008 at +00:0020081930UTC06: am30
[...] Kai – Leadership – Is Servant Leadership a Broken Model? [...]
Thursday, November 6, 2008 at +00:0020082930UTC06: am30
What do we do with Jesus? His leadership style -spending time with the least influential, giving voice to excluded people, no butt kissing to the powers that be, etc. -is strongly resisted yet could these be the universally applicable principles that you mention? Just curious.
Thursday, November 6, 2008 at +00:0020084130UTC06: pm30
So I think I hear you saying that servanthood is something that people can be led to learn and imitate but you don’t see it as a legitimate style of leadership. Is that correct?
Thursday, November 6, 2008 at +00:0020083530UTC06: pm30
Bryan, I did not define leadership other than to say what it is not–service. So, yes, it is more of a reaction against the idea of “servant leadership” than an affirmative statement of principle, as the title hopefully implies.
Ellen, thanks for your comment. Yes, we see in the gospels many principles of leadership embodied in the words and actions of Jesus, but service is not one of them. It is its own ‘thing.’
Grace, exactly, but with one caveat…I am not sure there are different ‘leadership styles’ as you seem to put it. There are simply people who lead effectively and those who do not–regardless of the goals they lead people toward.
To be clear, leaders have different personalities and they use different methods and tools, but these are not styles per se. They are just what you think they are…personalities and methods used to teach and lead, but leadership is set apart from these things, although they certainly interact.
Thursday, November 6, 2008 at +00:0020085630UTC06: pm30
[...] Kai – Leadership – Is Servant Leadership a Broken Model? [...]
Thursday, November 6, 2008 at +00:0020084930UTC06: pm30
Hi Kai, thanks for your thought-provoking post. I have also posted on leadership but from a South African perspective, quoting our biggest daily newspaper that asks “Where is OUR Obama?”
Friday, November 7, 2008 at +00:0020082230UTC07: pm30
Hmmm, I suppose I think Christian principles are the universal ones, not just a segment. I also wonder how you would then define leadership. I do see servanthood as leadership and think that is a fair understanding of what Jesus set forth for us.
Saturday, November 8, 2008 at +00:0020085330UTC08: pm30
[...] Kai – Leadership – Is Servant Leadership a Broken Model? [...]
Monday, November 10, 2008 at +00:0020085630UTC10: pm30
[...] Kai – Leadership – Is Servant Leadership a Broken Model? [...]
Monday, December 1, 2008 at +00:0020083831UTC01: pm31
[...] kai – Leadership – Is Servant Leadership a Broken Model? [...]
Wednesday, June 24, 2009 at +00:0020093330UTC24: pm30
[...] Kai – Leadership – Is Servant Leadership a Broken Model? [...]